
CULTIC
Overwhelmingly PositiveAI Summary
Medium Risk⏰ Data from 56 days agoCULTIC: A Retro Shooter with Polarizing Chapter 2 and Performance Concerns
CULTIC delivers a stellar first chapter with great gunplay and atmosphere, but Chapter 2's design and performance issues create a polarized experience.
Sentiment Distribution
Players love the immersive world and tight gameplay loop.
Solid experience with minor rough edges.
Enjoyable but held back by technical issues.
Frustrating progression and poor optimization.
Feels unfinished and not worth the price.
Top Discussion Topics
Full Report
Core Impression
CULTIC is a well-crafted retro horror shooter that excels in atmosphere and gunplay, but its second chapter divides players and technical issues on lower-end hardware raise red flags. Key data: 52% of 200 analyzed reviews are 'loved', 28% 'liked', 11% 'mixed', 6% 'disliked', and 3% 'hated'. The most praised topic is gunplay (93% positive), while performance (25% positive) and boss fights (29% positive) are the weakest.
What Players Love
TOP 3 praise points: 1. Gunplay: Players consistently praise the satisfying headshots and weapon feel. One player said, "Headshots are satisfying as hell. The whole thing plays beautifully from start to finish." 2. Horror atmosphere: The creepy ambiance and sound design are widely appreciated. A review notes, "Cultic is dripping with creepy atmosphere, plus it has some of the BEST sounding guns in any shooter." 3. Level design (Chapter 1): The first chapter's maps are highly regarded for their tight design and rewarding exploration. A player commented, "The level design is so well done, and the graphics are crisp and the perfect amount of retro."
What Players Dislike
TOP 3 complaint points: 1. Chapter 2 quality: Many players find the second chapter's maps overly large and confusing. One review states, "The maps in Chapter 2 are giant rat nests that fold and circle back into each other until the map layout feels like a massive tumbleweed with very little hints or direction on where to go." 2. Resource management: Ammo scarcity is a common frustration. A player wrote, "ammo is a constant problem... when a game makes ammo this scarce it's just boring." 3. Performance: Some players report poor optimization, especially on Steam Deck. One complaint reads, "The performance is completely unacceptable. The terrible retro pixelated visuals can't run with stable 60 fps even on a lowest settings on a steam deck."
Risk Signals
The most significant risk is the sharp divide in quality between Chapter 1 and Chapter 2. Chapter 2 has a positive ratio of only 45%, with frequent complaints about map size, enemy bullet sponges, and pacing. This has led to a notable portion of mixed and negative reviews (17% combined). Performance issues on low-end devices (25% positive ratio) and complaints about boss fights (29% positive) are secondary but persistent concerns. Additionally, a small number of players (3% hated) feel the game is incomplete, expecting the second chapter to be a free update rather than a separate purchase. Overall, the sentiment is largely positive, but the Chapter 2 controversy and technical issues warrant a medium risk level.
Want a specific game analyzed, or have feedback or a collaboration idea?
Requests are usually processed within a day — free, no sign-up needed.
📬 Subscribe for the latest Steam game insights and trend analysis
Only for SteamSense updates. Unsubscribe anytime.