SteamSense
Oxygen Not Included

Oxygen Not Included

Overwhelmingly Positive

AI Summary

Low Risk⏰ Data from 77 days ago

Oxygen Not Included Public Opinion Brief: Hardcore Simulation Masterpiece Highly Recognized, Learning Curve and Optimization Issues Spark Debate

A hardcore masterpiece deeply loved by core simulation players, its outstanding depth and system design overshadow the high learning curve and some experiential flaws.

Sentiment Distribution

Loved52%

Players highly appreciate the game's depth, complexity, and replayability, finding it extremely challenging and addictive, offering unparalleled entertainment value.

Liked28%

Players like the game's core mechanics and creativity, but find the learning curve steep or have some minor design issues, overall recommended.

Mixed11%

Players have conflicting feelings about the game, both appreciating its depth and creativity while feeling frustrated by its complexity, lack of guidance, or repetitiveness.

Disliked6%

Players are disappointed due to the game being overly complex, lacking guidance, having optimization issues, or repetitive gameplay, resulting in a poor experience.

Hated3%

Players strongly dislike the game's design, finding it inaccessible, unenjoyable, or a complete failure, and do not recommend purchasing.

Top Discussion Topics

Positive (>70%)
Mixed (40–70%)
Negative (<40%)

Full Report

Core Impression

Oxygen Not Included is a hardcore colony simulation game known for its extreme depth, complex systems, and strong replayability. Among the 150 comments analyzed, positive (love + like) emotions account for as high as 80%, indicating a high level of recognition from the player base for its core experience.

Player Favorites

The three most praised advantages by players are:

  1. Depth and Complexity: 75% of players who mentioned this gave positive reviews, believing the game systems are profound and challenging. One player said: "This is such a deep, balanced game, complex without being punishing, and really fun to play."
  2. Physics System and Resource Management: The game's physics simulation and resource management systems received nearly unanimous praise, with positive review rates of 96% and 100% respectively. Players commend that "Everything (vaguely) follows real physics so gases have weight, heat transfer matters," and believe "If you like complex resource management games, this is your jam."
  3. Replay Value and Art Style: The game's replayability (95% positive) and unique art style (100% positive) are highly acclaimed. Players think "ONI is incredibly challenging with an insane replay value," and "Love the art Style and sillyness!"

Player Dissatisfactions

The three major issues criticized by players include:

  1. Steep Learning Curve and Lack of Guidance: Although 71% of those who mentioned it acknowledge its challenge, the high entry difficulty and insufficient tutorial guidance (only 21% positive) are main pain points. Players complain "The learning curve was rough. Still is. I haven't figured out how to do a lot of things," and point out "No instruction on how to play the game. No explanation of controls."
  2. Duplicant AI and Tedious Operations: The AI logic of Duplicants is a focus of criticism, with only 37% of mentions being positive. Players feel frustrated: "Duplicant stupidity/inability to do chores intelligently destroys the fun for me," and believe "The game has way too many QoL issues to be any fun."
  3. Late-Game Optimization Issues: The game's late-game performance optimization is a clear shortcoming, with only 6% of related mentions being positive. Players report "Unfortunately, this game is completely UNoptimized. By cycle 800 the game just becomes entirely unplayable."

Risk Warning

The current public opinion risk level is low. The overall reputation of the game is extremely solid, with positive reviews dominating (80%), and the core gameplay is strongly supported by the deep player community. Negative points (such as learning curve, AI, optimization) are clearly present but have not triggered large-scale complaints or a downward trend in ratings, and are more often seen as inherent characteristics of this hardcore game type or areas for improvement. Mixed emotions (11%) and negative emotions (9%) account for a relatively low proportion, indicating limited controversy.

Analyzed 500 reviews
Analysis from April 20, 2026
AI cost: $0.0000

Want a specific game analyzed, or have feedback or a collaboration idea?

Requests are usually processed within a day — free, no sign-up needed.

Get in touch →

📬 Subscribe for the latest Steam game insights and trend analysis

Only for SteamSense updates. Unsubscribe anytime.