Cities: Skylines II
MixedAI Summary
High Risk⏰ Data from 78 days agoCities: Skylines II Public Opinion Brief: A Sequel Where Potential and Controversy Coexist
A city simulation sequel with a solid foundation in gameplay and visuals, but mired in a reputation crisis due to severe performance issues and controversial commercial strategies.
Sentiment Distribution
Very satisfied with the game's core gameplay, graphics, and long-term improvements, considering it an excellent or promising city-building game.
Acknowledges the game's fun, improvements, or potential, but points out obvious issues like performance, content, or optimization, overall recommends or holds an optimistic attitude.
Has complex feelings about the game experience, seeing both significant strengths and serious weaknesses, making it difficult to give a clear recommendation or rejection.
Disappointed and dissatisfied with the game's performance optimization, bugs, content completeness, or DLC strategy, believing it falls short of expectations or is inferior to its predecessor.
Extreme anger and regret towards the game, believing it has fundamental flaws, deceives consumers, or is completely unacceptable, strongly advising against purchase.
Top Discussion Topics
Full Report
Core Impression
Cities: Skylines II is a city-building sequel with solid core gameplay and excellent visual presentation, but severely hampered by performance issues. Among the 200 player reviews analyzed, positive reviews (love + like) accounted for 38%, while negative reviews (dislike + hate) accounted for as high as 50%, showing a clear polarization.
Player Favorites
Players most appreciate three aspects of this game: first, its core building and simulation gameplay, which they find immersive and therapeutic, with one player saying "It's an amazing game"; second, the game's visual presentation, with most players praising "The graphics are amazing and realistic"; finally, the continuous improvements since launch, with positive reviews generally acknowledging "It has improved a lot since the launch."
Player Dissatisfaction
Player dissatisfaction mainly centers on three points: the primary and most prominent issue is performance optimization, mentioned 42 times with a positive review rate of only 12%, as players complain "Game play is nice, Optimization is bad. My spec is getting 20 frames per second at the population of just 100k people"; second is the DLC and monetization strategy, with a positive review rate of only 6%, as players criticize it for having "more DLCs than game"; third is the poor traffic system AI logic, with chaotic vehicle behavior, as one player believes "Traffic is so annoying that the game is unplayable."
Risk Warning
Public opinion carries high-risk signals. Negative reviews (dislike + hate) total 50%, far exceeding the 38% positive reviews. Performance optimization is the biggest pain point, with concentrated and intense negative feedback. Meanwhile, the DLC strategy has sparked strong player dissatisfaction with the developer's profit model and a feeling of being "scammed," as one player put it, "I feel like I was scammed." Although there are some positive voices about updates and improvements, the widespread performance complaints and the trust crisis caused by DLCs are the main public opinion risks at present.
Want a specific game analyzed, or have feedback or a collaboration idea?
Requests are usually processed within a day — free, no sign-up needed.
📬 Subscribe for the latest Steam game insights and trend analysis
Only for SteamSense updates. Unsubscribe anytime.